With conversational AI, semantic parsing allows the meaning to be extracted from each and every word, immediately.
We are able, at scale, to infer how positive an interaction is, how the participants are feeling in relation to the subject or subjects of the conversation, and how strong the relationship is between the participants. We are also able to track changes in these measures over time.
Using a trained human to do this properly could take several hours for each phone call. Using Conversational AI, the same job can be done in seconds. Here is an example of :
5 December 2007, Manager D stated (in an internal telephone conversation with Manager E) that he had “touched on [the] topic” of LIBOR submissions at a meeting with the FSA.
Manager D stated “we didn’t say anything along the lines of, you know, we’re not posting where we think we should […] because of. I just talked about dislocations, LIBORs […] and kept it […] simple, shall we say”.
This short two sentence answer is full of red flags. So much so that when given to our law-enforcement trained Forensic Linguistic Analyst they came back with two pages of explanation as to why. Here is just a snippet of that:
Manager D starts by saying in the negative what wasn’t said. This is sensitive to Manager D. The expected is for him to either simply say what was said or to deny any allegation. Also, of note is the pronoun “we.” Whatever wasn’t said relates to more than one. Manager D doesn’t want to be alone at this point in the statement. The shortest answer is best. His answer breaks the principle of brevity, thus giving the impression of a need to convince as opposed to simply convey information.
Markers of negation, explainers, hedging, all would be flagged by AI and machine learning. Intelligent Voice’s solution LexiQal identifies all these ‘markers’ triggering the system to raise an alert. To find out more about LexiQal and conversational AI join Intelligent Voice’s GTC session, SS31452: ‘Detecting Deception and Tackling Insurance Fraud using GPU-powered Conversational AI’ 14th April 5pm BST.
Thanks Sarah, fascinating. I’ve worked on dealing floors in New York, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Johannesburg and London. What has struck me is the localisation of dialects. there is the commingling of language and culture. I’m not really talking about the culture of the places. That’s a given, it is the microcosm of culture brought in to the area brought about by the commingling of parties. Thinking back to Hong Kong, there were Canto-cockney rhyming themes. All very amusing for us, but devilish for control staff to tackle and cut through. To give an example, IOI is a Palm Oil grower and refiner. When looking for a quote in the bonds, the inter dealer broker (IDB) would ask me “have you got anything in the Edwins?”. These would (of course) be the Edwin Starrs. Edwin famous for his hit “eye to eye contact”. What else would you call the IOI convertible bonds?